further lines on the judgments in the failed prosecution in HMA v Coulson

The perma-tanned perjurer’s fluorescent

With rage, not sunbed iridescence

As courts have rendered him incandescent

Deciding the Crown should have had more sense

Than prosecute based on evidence

Obtained by one with no lessons

In procedural rules of relevance.

So when Coulson freed was effervescent

The Tomster was not acquiescent.

Advertisements

About loveandgarbage

I watch the telly and read when not doing law stuff and plugging my decade and a half old unwatched Edinburgh fringe show.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s