Apparently new examples of this might breach an injunction in my neighbouring jurisdiction

Apparently an English judge has granted an injunction.

This applies in England. But the wording would appear to prohibit new images like this:

So Gillette, take note.

Of course you can still publish in Scottish newspapers.

Advertisements

About loveandgarbage

I watch the telly and read when not doing law stuff and plugging my decade and a half old unwatched Edinburgh fringe show.
This entry was posted in tiger woods, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Apparently new examples of this might breach an injunction in my neighbouring jurisdiction

  1. As the injunction includes the phrase ‘any naked part of the subject’s body’, couldn’t any photos of ‘the subject’ breach the investigation? Unless ‘the subject’ happened to be wearing a burka in them, of course.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s