The verdict on The Verdict

will follow when my children have recovered from chickenpox and I have more time to post.

However, for those interested in these things day one is accessible here with full evidence, day two here with full evidence.

The show has all of the flaws I feared (a celeb driven case, and celeb driven jury full of self-obsessives with image issues isn’t really the best way to shed light on the prejudices of a jury system) and consequently lacks the purity of celebrity-free Consent (on C4 recently) although it may come into its own in the jury deliberation  FUrther it lacks credibility given the fact that the jury members didn’t come up with appropriate excuses to avoid being anywhere near the jury.  

However, as a round up for those that have not watched so far you’ve missed:

(a) Jeffrey Archer making a move on Jennifer Ellison (because she will have most experience of pressured situations and unwanted advances (Ah, the irony));
(b) Stan Collymore speaking over people in the first day of jury discussions
(c) Patsy Palmer writing a poem and joking with Jennifer Ellison while evidence is being led
(d) Stan Collymore suggesting that Jeffrey Archer was perhaps not the best person to make assessments of credibility of witnesses (a wonderful TV moment)
(e) Alex James looking angst ridden
(f) Stan Collymore confessing his love for the defence counsel 
(g) Jeffrey Archer talking about the tenderness of anal sex to Honor Blackman, while Alex James discusses its popularity among the young as a popular form of contraception
(h) Stan Collymore reiterating many times that people should only consider the evidence
(i) Miguel Denzil Xavier Portillo being a de facto chair of the jury due to the intervention of the woman from Ann Summers
(j) Megaman complaining that juries don’t decide things on the evidence – as it took three cases to acquit him
(k) A chain smoking judge
(l) The bearded bloke from Sliders appearing to be some sort of defence counsel
(m) basically a rehash of Crown Court but without the top theme music (available on this record)

The BBC website for the programme is a mass of delights including a posting from Stan Collymore and a further one from Stan that has generated considerable response.  Stan’s postings are very informative.

Anyway I won’t be watching live tomorrow as Life on mars returns with the important Marc Warren imprimature of BBC top telly credibility.

Edited Tuesday am to add the pic

Advertisements

About loveandgarbage

I watch the telly and read when not doing law stuff and plugging my decade and a half old unwatched Edinburgh fringe show.
This entry was posted in jeffrey archer, television, the verdict, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The verdict on The Verdict

  1. Anonymous says:

    (a) Jeffrey Archer making a move on Jennifer Ellison (because she will have most experience of pressured situations and unwanted advances (Ah, the irony));
    —-> Good lord, those two as a couple doesnt bear thinking about. almost as funny as the weekly publishing in private eye of andrew neill and his young oriental love, from a few years back.
    (b) Stan Collymore speaking over people in the first day of jury discussions
    —-> He really needs a reality check.
    (c) Patsy Palmer writing a poem and joking with Jennifer Ellison while evidence is being led
    —-> Rickeeeee!! (couldnt resist!)
    (d) Stan Collymore suggesting that Jeffrey Archer was perhaps not the best person to make assessments of credibility of witnesses (a wonderful TV moment)
    —-> obviously beating ulrika jonsson and being a serial “dogger” qualifies you for this
    (e) Alex James looking angst ridden
    —-> thats totally blur!
    (f) Stan Collymore confessing his love for the defence counsel
    —-> that was very diplomatically put. it was more “she’s well cute”, or something like that
    (g) Jeffrey Archer talking about the tenderness of anal sex to Honor Blackman, while Alex James discusses its popularity among the young as a popular form of contraception
    —-> nothing better to discuss over sunday lunch eh?
    (h) Stan Collymore reiterating many times that people should only consider the evidence
    —-. snoooozee…..
    (i) Miguel Denzil Xavier Portillo being a de facto chair of the jury due to the intervention of the woman from Ann Summers
    —-> Mikey was just gaining his credibility back in my eyes, until this piece of folly
    (j) Megaman complaining that juries don’t decide things on the evidence – as it took three cases to acquit him
    —-> three cases, and three hundred intimidated witnesses
    (k) A chain smoking judge
    —-> does loveandgarbarge fear for this judge’s life as much as i do? jaundice, alcoholism and general peakiness seemed to be some of his symptoms
    (l) The bearded bloke from Sliders appearing to be some sort of defence counsel
    —-> who was this fellow? a real QC?
    (m) basically a rehash of Crown Court but without the top theme music (available on this record)
    —-> thanks for that!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s