Police fear for safety of politicians as too many have crowded on bandwagon

Police today issued a warning to politicians that so many have climbed aboard the “React to Hilary Mantel’s five and a half thousand word lecture delivered two weeks ago that has only just been splashed in the media after being printed in a literary magazine last week although we have not read the piece and have only picked up one or two choice extracts from a story in a tabloid paper  whose readers we are trying to court” bandwagon that public safety has been compromised.

A senior police officer said,

“Ordinarily when there is a passing bandwagon only a small number of politicians leap on and there is no danger of the bandwagon toppling over and crushing them in a pointless and futile tragedy. However, with the interventions of the Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition – who have jumped aboard despite appearing to have no awareness of the dangers that lurk beneath a Mantel piece – there is now a danger that the bandwagon will overturn pummeling their stupid skulls into a mush. However, they may also injure other roadusers in the vicinity – and that won’t do.

“In such circumstances we in the police recommend that politicians should avoid bandwagon jumping and instead indulge in a knee-jerk response. If the knee is jerked hard enough the only potential danger is that the foot will kick the politician in his own face. And frankly, that’s not going to bother anyone. And it might help tidy up the gene pool.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Snowey cokey – live-blog

8.51 More snow.

8.37 Still snowing. It’s that wet snow that lies on the ground and makes it white.

8.14 blah blah blah snow

7.58 Well it is January. And we were told to expect wintry weather.

7.46 Yep. Snow.

7.37 Yep. Still snowing.

7.25 Yeah, still snowing.

7.10 Loveandgarbage is awoken from uneasy dreams to discover the world has transformed into a giant winter wonderland.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Toby Young – an apology

I am sorry for Toby Young

Toby Young

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ubbish.Hogmanay live-blog

21:33 [copying files from an external hard drive to a desktop]

21:19 but it’s rubbish.

21:18 Contemplating Scottish television. Saying nothing.

21:00 Three hours then.

20:57 He left a set of vacuum cleaners around his garden pond. Like some art installation.

20:55 I knew someone that once confused vacuum cleaning goblins with gnomes.

20:54 Bloody goblins.

20:51 [yawns]

20:48 36 seconds in  

20:44 Whenever I am reminded of new year I remember Mr Potter in It’s a Wonderful Life.

20:43 Had a quick look at Borges’ Book of imaginary beings. Not a peep about goblins resembling small vacuum cleaners.

20:42 And goblins really have a long thin tail with a three point plug and a big windy trunk of a nose.

20:41 Unless the mythical representation of the goblin as some little scamp of a bod is misleading.

20:40 They don’t look like goblins.

20:39 Why did they call those little vacuum cleaners goblins?

20:37 We’re into dire panel shows already on the telly. Hellish. Even with folk I like on them.

20:27 Can’t be bothered now either. I don’t need an excuse to eat shortbread and would rather have good stuff on telly, as opposed to mawkish maudlin retrospectives and forced conviviality and bonhomie among bad telly newsreaders and their pretend friends.

20:26 I didn’t even care about New Year before kids came along. Used to go to bed early. Always seemed a waste of time.

20:25 Was gazing into space thinking about pasties there. Lost track of time.

20:15 I miss the pasty news.

20:13 Fiscal cliff. Fiscal Cliff Lazarenko. Fiscal Cliff Richard. Fiscal Cliff Barnes. White Fiscal Cliffs of Dover. Bernie “fiscal” Clif(f)ton.

20:12 blah blah blah eight. [yawns]

20:09 eh. what? Where was I? dozed off for a moment. Telly was so good. Even better to come.

19:56 Four minutes to eight. Well. there you go, eh?

19:53 Seven minutes to eight. Stunning.

19:51 It’s nine minutes to eight. Only another four hours and nine minutes until 2013.

19:50 It’s ten to eight. Only another four hours and ten minutes until 2013. Unless you’re somewhere in a different time zone obviously. In which case it might be 2013 already. Or not for five and a bit hours. Or more.

19:49 Following the example of The Guardian, who – having given up on weather based live-blogs – randomly choose to measure the passage of time now here is the live-blog you have been waiting for: the loveandgarbage special Hogmanay live-blog in which I will give you a regular update on the countdown to 2013.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Blog posts from 2012

Here are my nominations for the Orwell prize for proper blogging about big news type things.

In January the two biggest stories were Ed Miliband remembering the late Bob Holness’s contribution to Blackbusters; and a writer from the Independent committing Hari Kiri .

In February it was established (after consideration by a real live court) that dogs were Britain’s leading financial advisers; and there was speculation that a man with a dog and car window would become England’s new football manager. Two long-running stories began: Paul Gambaccini’s reign of terror in the matter of all pop related deaths; and football journalists reminding us how much they knew about the law of corporate insolvency.

In March Engelbert Humperdinck was placed under police protection; an SFA inquiry confirmed that the SFA could not organise an evening of heavy drinking in a brewery and urged that a stable door should be closed after a horse had left earlier in the day; and the main political stories related to jerry-cans and pasties. Newsnight had a pasty special edition – which is hoped will become an annual feature.

Nothing happened in April apart from a penguin standing for the council in Edinburgh. The penguin successfully defeated the Liberal Democrats but failed to be elected.

In May I spoiled my paper in the council elections; and Gambaccini’s blood lust reached a peak for the year.

In June Bletchley park was charged by David Cameron with the task of breaking the ministerial code; I failed in my responsibilities as a parent by failing to leave my children in a pub; and I left Parliament to start up a new social media outlet : Garbagen (Garbagout). I also exclusively revealed Jimmy Carr’s statement responding to embarrassing media stories about him.

In July nothing happened.

In August it was wall to wall Julian Assange stories as the duchy of Grand Fenwick turned down the Ecuadorean ambassador’s request for asylum; and I revealed the existence of the little discussed case of Smith v DPP that could help Assange in his bid to avoid extradition to Sweden. In other news, following the example of one Scottish magazine, I confirmed that George Galloway was not employed as a columnist for Loveandgarbage. Also, after reading the high quality legal analysis of Glenn Greenwald on the Guardian I managed to exclusively publish the Guardian’s handy style guide for those wanting to write about foreign legal systems of which they know little.

In September I was leaked a copy of Nick Clegg’s original apology; and I published the picture the British media refused to touch with my topless picture of the Duchess of Cambridge.

In October I faithfully transcribed all news bulletins.

In NOvember there was the tannadicelad incident on twitter the truth of which, like the case of the Giant Rat of Sumatra, cannot yet be revealed.

In December three idiots waved their willies and I reviewed the year.

If I don’t win the Orwell Prize for serious blogging about proper stuff in 2013 I never will.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Review of the Year

2012, eh?

Bloody pasties.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Is there snow outside? LIVE-BLOG

14 December 2012

11.01 I brought the bin in. Its wheeled trail has marked the snow, an indicator of life. I feel bad about that. I close the curtains.

10.27 No more snow. But it’s still there. Lying.

10.16 It’s stopped. But there is still snow on the ground. It’s still there.

9.53 Still snowing.

9.40 Yeah, still snowing. Bit bored with it now.

9.30 I awoke yesterday morning to the sight of a dusting of snow – like sprinkled icing sugar attempting to disguise an unsuccessful offering in the Great British Bake-Off. Within literally time the snow had gone, in a timely reminder at this time of year that we too will melt, thaw, and resolve ourselves into a dew prior to decomposing and leaving no trace of our essence. I was distraught. Weepy. Perhaps I had already had my last live-blog of snow of the year. Perhaps the Guardian would never be in a position to bemoan the difficulty that someone that works there would have in getting his or her children to a school round the corner from his or her home, while someone else gave an update about living in the north of England, using words like “parky” to remind readers of the northern demographic. But now. Now it is back. The snow is here again. Outside. As I type. There is snow. A gentle fall. But it has been falling for fifteen minutes now, and the sky is grey. So yes. There is snow outside. The live-blog is activated. December is offering us wintery weather once again.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Modern culture in microcosm – a sociological survey using the medium of tweets sent by vacuous public figures

  1. Like many people I mainly spend my time on twitter watching celebrities being stupid. To aid me in this laudable objective I have set up a number of twitter lists where I gather celebrity tweets in one useful place. I have a list of Micky Flanagan fans, for example, which comprises a list – primarily of celebrities – who look like they probably like Micky Flanagan.

    My principal list is the list of vacuous public figures which, as the name implies, includes the tweets of public figures who are vacuous. The list comprises the loose droppings of the detritus of modern life, a microcosm of everything that is wrong with today. It is the sort of stuff that a future chronicler will use in his or her history of the decline and fall of celebrity culture. This evening the list was enlivened by three of the principal willy wavers of the modern age, engaging in a heated discussion about who was best.

  2. realDonaldTrump
    How can George Osborne reduce UK debt while spending billions to subsidize Scotland’s garbage wind turbines that are destroying the country?
  3. realDonaldTrump
    You’re all wrong—check the facts! UK is massively subsidizing Scotland’s wind turbines & the people don’t want them.
  4. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump RT Scottish don’t want wind turbines……..I think you have that wrong . The Scottish don’t want you !
  5. realDonaldTrump
    .@Lord_Sugar If you think ugly windmills are good for Scotland you are an even worse businessman than I thought…
  6. realDonaldTrump
    … and, in my opinion, should not be doing The Apprentice.
  7. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump RT: in my opinion you should not be doing the apprentice……..well you have NO SAY in that. The British like me not you
  8. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump the ugly windmills will bring more revenue and green power to Scotland than your golf project
  9. realDonaldTrump
    Sugar: @Lord_Sugar—unlike you, I own The Apprentice. You were never successful enough…
  10. realDonaldTrump
    …. to do The Apprentice but I approved you anyway. Without my show you’d be nothing!
  11. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump you approved me! What a load of rubbish dream on You don’t own apprentice Mark Burnett does. Shut up and argue with Obama
  12. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump success is measured with what you have in business.I own all my real estate with no bank borrowing how about you big shot?
  13. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump you only have 1.9m followers with 350m population in the US does that reflect your popularity?
  14. realDonaldTrump
    Sugar: @Lord_Sugar–Keep working hard so I make plenty of $ with your show…
  15. realDonaldTrump
    …You have little persona, but The Apprentice concept is great and lucky for you!
  16. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump RT: you have little persona …….in England we say the pot calling the kettle black . You have had a charisma bypass
  17. piersmorgan
    Hahaha, LOVE this > RT @realDonaldTrump: Sugar: @Lord_Sugar—unlike you, I own The Apprentice. You were never successful enough…
  18. Lord_Sugar
    @piersmorgan trump owns the apprentice hah hah just like I own Arsenal . Or to put it another way like you are the biggest star on US TV
  19. piersmorgan
    Don’t wish to interfere obviously @realDonaldTrump – but it may be time to fire @Lord_Sugar from YOUR show for his impertinence?
  20. Lord_Sugar
    @piersmorgan @realdonaldtrump RT: time for you to fire him from your show…….let’s see if the big shot can stop me doing the apprentice
  21. realDonaldTrump
    When I made the Apprentice the #1 show in the US, that was a good day for you…
  22. realDonaldTrump
    … and many others. Drop to your knees, Sugar, and say thank you, Mr. Trump.
  23. piersmorgan
    Greatest tweet of all time… hahahahahahahaha > @realDonaldTrump: Drop to your knees, Sugar, and say thank you, Mr. Trump.
  24. realDonaldTrump
    @piersmorgan @Lord_Sugar I easily could but as long as Sugar is making me money (it’s my show) I won’t–unlike Sugar, I’m not stupid!
  25. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump @piersmorgan you are full of sh.. Trump you have no power over the UK apprentice, just like the Scottish people .
  26. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey @Lord_Sugar—Look in the mirror and thank the real Lord that Donald Trump exists. You are nothing!
  27. piersmorgan
    BOOM! > RT @realDonaldTrump: Dopey @Lord_Sugar—Look in the mirror and thank the real Lord that Donald Trump exists. You are nothing!”
  28. Lord_Sugar
    @piersmorgan @realdonaldtrump the only one who drops to his knees is Morgan he kisses ar… I trained him how to win your celeb show
  29. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump donny did u know @piersmorgan called me before he won yr show.I told him how to win by massaging your fat ego. It worked !
  30. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump you only have 1.9 m followers not good for your ego how comes I have 2.5m and you have 6 times more population than UK
  31. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump did I miss your reply if you have bank debt on your real estate . Do any American followers know about Trumps financials ?
  32. piersmorgan
    Exactly! > RT @realDonaldTrump: @Lord_Sugar @piersmorgan Sugar, if you taught Piers Morgan he never would have won!
  33. realDonaldTrump
    Sugar @Lord_Sugar—you should say thank you, Donald, like a good little boy… …
  34. realDonaldTrump
    …instead of biting the hand that feeds you! Don’t bother, just keep making me money!
  35. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump thank you for allowing the UK audience to form a comparison between me and you . YOU LOST ask them who is better at it
  36. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump @piersmorgan I might be ignorant as I must have missed your reply if you have bank debt on the real estate they own.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

A further sociological examination of modern society using the medium of tweets by vacuous public figures

  1. Last night I collated a series of tweets by three of the great thinkers of the modern age, individuals who contribute much to the gaiety of nations and who have made a valuable contribution to modern cultural life. Those tweets can be found here http://storify.com/loveandgarbage/modern-culture-in-microcosm-a-sociological-survey.

    I would have scored yesterday as a win for Sugar, with Morgan fulfilling the role of the giggling Richard Hammond type figure to the Jeremy Clarkson bully, familiar to fans of Stewart Lee’s Top Gear routine.

    Well, our three intellectual behemoths had not had enough yesterday and their willy waving continued today.

  2. The initial shot is one of Trump’s occasional motivational quotes – the sort of thing Jerry Springer used to use in his final thought while moralising on his talk show after discussion about some bloke in dungarees sleeping with his wife’s sister..
  3. realDonaldTrump
    “A general is just as good or just as bad as the troops under his command make him.” –Douglas MacArthur
  4. Cue Sugar:
  5. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump RT:A general is good as his troops…..You must have bad troops. If Wikipedia is right you have failed so many times
  6. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump Hey Donny general consensus in the UK is I kicked your ar..on twitter.Your business failures make good reading on Wikapedia
  7. and we’re off
  8. realDonaldTrump
    @Lord_Sugar @realDonaldTrump You lie. Everyone knows your ass is being kicked on twitter. You’re easy.
  9. realDonaldTrump
    Sugar @Lord_Sugar Unlike yours, my financials are phenomenal. People don’t know your real numbers & would not be impressed.
  10. realDonaldTrump
    Sugar @Lord_Sugar Why don’t you tell the public what you’re really worth–they would be very disappointed.
  11. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump TRUMP no one can get your numbers “Smoke and Mirrors”.My numbers published at UK companies house. How much do u owe banks?
  12. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump I am worth a few hundred million pounds.I don’t lie and say I am billionaire as I am not. .Do you have any real money ?
  13. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump How much did you pay in defamation case to analyst who forecast Taj Mahal project was doomed.You settled privatly
  14. Now one of the people I really like on twitter is James Ward. He spoke for many.
  15. But back to the spat.
  16. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar–I’m worth more than $8 billion, acknowledged, almost no debt …
  17. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar.@Lord_Sugar …Your net worth doesn’t even qualify you to host the Apprentice. Keep making me money.
  18. realDonaldTrump
    .@Lord_Sugar – nice call on predicting that the iPOD would be “dead, finished, gone, kaput” bit.ly/fwaNBh Great business foresight.
  19. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump Do you know what a iPod is ?.That’s my worst mistake,you’ve been near bankrupt in past and sent companies into Chapter 11
  20. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump My net worth is real Donny.Not sure u have money, you talk a good game.The people want to know how much do you owe banks
  21. piersmorgan
    OUCH! > RT @realDonaldTrump Dopey Sugar.@Lord_Sugar …Your net worth doesn’t even qualify you to host the Apprentice. Keep making me money.
  22. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar The wind turbines are ruining the beauty & majesty of Scotland…
  23. realDonaldTrump
    .@Lord_Sugar….but you wouldn’t notice because you have no vision and you are a total loser.
  24. Lord_Sugar
    @piersmorgan @realDonaldTrump Piersy you cant be happy associating with the Idiot Trump.He cant even put together an argument.Coach him
  25. And then three quick jabs from Sugar that have him comfortably ahead on points, irrespective of the ipod comment.
  26. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump In 1991 increasing debt brought Trump business to bankruptcy BRILLIANT BUSINESS MAN PART 1
  27. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump On November 2, 1992, the Trump Plaza Hotel filed a prepackaged Chapter 11 BRILLIANT BUSINESS MAN PART 2
  28. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump 2002 Securities and Exchange Commission brought a financial-report case against Trump Hotels BRILLIANT BUSINESS MAN PART 3
  29. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey @Lord_Sugar People are calling in saying you are being beaten badly w/ the tweets…
  30. Can’t see much evidence of that to be honest checking his @replies but there are a lot of people with private accounts on twitter obviously…
  31. realDonaldTrump
    …@Lord_Sugar You need the income from the show to keep going–hope it doesn’t hurt.
  32. Cue the estimable James Ward again
  33. iamjamesward
    @realdonaldtrump @Lord_Sugar Fucking grow up, both of you. You’re grown men for fuck’s sake.
  34. But the willy waving goes on.
  35. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey @Lord_Sugar I’m worth $8 billion and you’re worth peanuts…without my show nobody would even know who you are.
  36. realDonaldTrump
    Via @digitalspyus: “Donald Trump to Lord Sugar: ‘Drop to your knees and thank me’” bit.ly/11RPWKe
  37. Trump quotes himself there with a comment that is up for the Bad Sex Award 2013.
  38. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump You are funny $8billion you are a comedian. Why do you make an idiot of yourself in front of people.8 billion lira !
  39. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump by the way its not your show. You don’t own it, you have no say in it. And you can’t stop me doing it in the UK.So shut up
  40. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump I don’t think you could write a cheque for $100m . You are full of sh.. And the American public know it.
  41. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump you stupid man every one knows when I did the show I gave the fee to charity. You double barrel to..
  42. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump you deluded pr.. The twitter stream supports I’ve kicked your ar.. You are a bully and not used to someone giving you hell.
  43. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump hey folks arrogant bully big shot Trump. Won’t admit he has massive bank debt. Frightened to reply. Not sure he has money?
  44. and so it goes. Although Trump finishes his evening with
  45. realDonaldTrump
    People ask me what I do in my free time. The answer–I don’t have any.
  46. for which after yesterday and today comment seems superfluous.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Day 3 – modern culture in microcosm – a sociological examination of modern life using the medium of tweets by vacuous…

  1. Like the islanders of Todday in Whisky galore, the behemoths of modern television took the sabbath off, presumably to recharge their Dorothy Parker barbed wit batteries. I mean the scintilating repartee exhibited in the two previous days of abusive tweets must surely have taken it out of three individuals with the combined verbal dexterity of Harpo Marx.
  2. Today began with Donald Trump retweeting some sycophantic Hammond style slavering from Piers Morgan.
  3. piersmorgan
    Exactly! > RT @realDonaldTrump: @Lord_Sugar @piersmorgan Sugar, if you taught Piers Morgan he never would have won!
  4. piersmorgan
    Greatest tweet of all time… hahahahahahahaha > @realDonaldTrump: Drop to your knees, Sugar, and say thank you, Mr. Trump.
  5. and then using deploying of the wit and erudition for which he has become famous
  6. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar I never go silent. I was buying a major property in Florida–a property worth more than you are!
  7. Donny then started retweeting random punters who had agreed with him. From the veritable plethora of a pile of responses he must have received from Mrs Trellis of North Wales Trump chose these
  8. MikeFMacleod77
    @Lord_Sugar @realdonaldtrump think you have that wrong Mr Sugar. The vast majority of businessmen and golfers welcome The Trump Organisation
  9. Two completely representative people from Aberdeenshire there
  10. Donny then returned to the attack.
  11. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar I hear your ratings last week were at an all time low–you better get them up or you’ll be fired.
  12. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar Bad ratings–come on, keep making me money–remember, I own your show.
  13. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar–You’re a total loser who @piersmorgan doesn’t think is very smart or very rich. I agree with Piers!
  14. Tactical error there by Trump. Agreeing with morgan immediately raises questions about someone’s judgment.
  15. Donny then retweeted some other random punter.
  16. jack_perry1992
    @lord_sugar @realDonaldTrump
    Never thought I’d see this day, trumps making sugar look like a little boy, hahaha #LoveIt
    #TrumpFan
  17. Before returning to his homoerotic banter.
  18. And retweeting well known figures (no, me neither)
  19. realDonaldTrump
    DopeySugar @Lord_Sugar —Why did you close down your site over the weekend? Did someone tell you to do it?
  20. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar—@Lord_Sugar Isn’t it sad that my golf course in Scotland just got “best new course in the world”—it’s worth more than you are!
  21. Donny then retweeted Morgan, whose desperation to pick the right bully in the schoolyard fight leaves you wondering what sort of impact his school days had on him
  22. piersmorgan
    Beginning to feel a bit sorry for poor old Shuggsy @Lord_Sugar – The Donald’s pounding him into oblivion today…. @realDonaldTrump
  23. And his lawyer who assured us Donny is absolutely solvent and debt free. (it’s amazing what chapter 11 does for your companies in the US isn’t it?)
  24. MichaelCohen212
    @lord_sugar I work for the man and have his complete financials. I can assure you he has very little debt…even you would be impressed!
  25. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar—I hear you hate being beaten so badly on twitter—get used to it!
  26. Enter wee Al stage right.
  27. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump Idiot! You should know not to believe what media says.Learn to use twitter.All my post on your big fat ego are still there
  28. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump How can it be voted best golf course in the world if it is not open . You deluded idiot .
  29. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump I did a little survey of American followers asked what they think of you.They have the same opinion as UK. BS BULLY IDIOT
  30. Lord_Sugar
    @piersmorgan @realDonaldTrump Poor Piersy must have spent the weekend with Donny licking their wounds.Comparing SUGAR bashing they’ve had
  31. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump Hi Dumb Donny here is a list of all the posts from me NOT DELETED YOU IDIOT bit.ly/W05c3w
  32. This handily collates all Lord Sugar’s tweets to Trump. It will priove an important historical document.
  33. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar You should thank me for having created the platform on which you became known–The Apprentice. Say Thank you Donald
  34. Al then goes on the attack
  35. Lord_Sugar
    I looked to see if DONALDTRUMPSUCKS.COM was available, it was registered by someone as long ago in 1999 @realDonaldTrump
  36. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump RT:Thank me for the platform where you became known…DUMB DONNY I was well known in the UK long before you went Chapter 11
  37. Lord_Sugar
    @realDonaldTrump DUMB DONNY next time you paint some of your apartments in NY get the painter to work on your fake tan bit.ly/SLNuAm
  38. Of course n between sending insults to Trump Lord Sugar is also flogging a nail file
  39. Lord_Sugar
    Wow orders pouring in thick n fast or my personally signed Xmas gift. Boss should buy for staff bit.ly/VTBv2D Ends 18 Dec.
  40. With Lord Sugar returning to his nail file Donny decided to concentrate on petty insults.
  41. realDonaldTrump
    .@Lord_Sugar If you didn’t say the iPod would be gone in a year, you might have been really rich instead of the peanut money you have.
  42. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar—if you were smart, which you are not, you would oppose the monstrous windfarms that will destroy your country.
  43. realDonaldTrump
    .@Lord_Sugar—windfarms are expensive, need subsidy,kill birds & destroy country & waterway beauty. Also, very unreliable & expensive energy.
  44. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar—you are the worst kind of loser—a total fool.
  45. realDonaldTrump
    @Lord_Sugar Dopey Sugar–because it was open all season long–you can’t play golf in the snow, you stupid ass.
  46. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar The people in the UK love seeing you get beat up–you’re easy!
  47. realDonaldTrump
    Dopey Sugar @Lord_Sugar I can’t believe you were knighted. If they knew more about you, I’m sure they’d take away your title.
  48. Anyway, when dealing with Trump remember this
  49. But, despite that momentary jeu d’esprit I am with James Ward
  50. Although being with him can lead you to share some strange allies
  51. iamjamesward
    Right Said Fred have just retweeted me calling Piers Morgan, Alan Sugar and Donald Trump “juvenile pricks”.
  52. But the moral surely is that when indulging in the noble art of verbal abuse to do it properly.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnPfgX82GmM

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Royal baby – a small legal thought

The law provides that the eldest male takes priority over any female, even if born earlier than the male, in the line of succession to inheriting the throne. This is up for review but amending legislation requires to be passed by various legislatures where the Queen is head of state in order to have effect. It is intended that the legislation be retrospective.

An interesting legal conundrum may arise. Assume there are royal twins, a boy and a girl. The girl is delivered first – prior to the legislatures enacting the new rules on succession. The boy will be third in line to the throne, the girl fourth, but as a result of retrospective legislation this will be reversed. The effect will be that the boy will have a number of his property rights expropriated by the state retrospectively. Could he – on reaching the age of majority – take legal action to challenge the legislation as being contrary to the ECHR?

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Is it snowing outside? the 2012 live-blog

3rd December 2012

1.50 pm – There is still snow outside.

12.38 pm – There is still snow outside.

11.54 am – There is still snow outside.

11.02 am – GRITTER!

9.55 am – There is still snow outside.

9.35 am – There is snow outside. Finished clearing paths and road. Made hot chocolate for youngest who is missing bursery due to adverse weather conditions.

9.10am – There is snow outside. Beginning clearing paths and road

8.50 am – There is snow outside. Take children to school

7.30 am – There is snow outside. Children have snowball fight.

6.20 am – Awoken by children insisting it is snowing outside. It is not. But there is snow outside as the glare through the curtains indicates.

2nd December 2012

11.05 am – and so to bed, the snow continuing to fall outside.

10.48 pm – Yes, and it is lying.

10.36 pm – Yes. yes there is snow outside.

10.34 pm – No. It is not snowing outside.

9.54 pm – No.

8.53 pm – I can exclusively report that it is not snowing outside.

8.52 pm – A yellow alert from the Met Office means that it is that time of year when the “is it snowing outside?” live-blog is initiated to inform readers whether or not it is snowing outside. As in previous years the live-blog will be regularly updated on this important question. Reports from other areas will be provided when available.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quiz question

Using your familiarity with the skills and attributes and prejudices of sectors of the Scottish media use your skill and judgment to guess how many newspapers contacted me to ask for controversial deleted tweets by a prominent Scottish media figure who - momentary examination of general search engines and specialist twitter search engines confirms - has never tweeted?

Answer to follow in a later blog.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Was James Delingpole a candidate in the Corby by-election?

Following the Guardian story about James Delingpole and Chris Heaton-Harris an interesting legal question arises: was James Delingpole, although never nominated, a candidate for the Corby by-election? The question is relevant because the government minister, John Hayes (whose views on wind-farms seem pertinent – as discussed here) has stressed in a response to The Guardian that “James Delingpole was never a candidate in this byelection.” (see response 4 in this article); and James Mackenzie, from the Better Nation team, has reported the conduct referred to in the Guardian piece to the police as potentially involving electoral offences.

Before getting  to the law it is worth looking at the public utterances of Mr Delingpole.  In The Spectator in early September he declared it was time to face the voters. The post has been deleted although a copy is found here. (h/t Tony Hatfield) His post ended with the declaration “I hereby announce my intention to stand in the Corby by-election as the anti-wind farm candidate. Not in my back yard. And not in yours either!” For a page that is no longer on the net it certainly has a lot of links, and got a lot of publicity. It is quoted by Guido Fawkes’ blog; the New Statesman; the Northants telegraph ; and others. A search reveals a few pages quoting his declaration. There was a website set up for his campaign, Delingpole for Corby. This has a number of stories (purporting to be by Mr Delingpole) in a news section. The first news entry is on 28 September 2012. And you can get a copy of Delingpole’s manifesto for Corby (pdf). And – if you are a big fan a window sticker. Delingpole also declared his candidature in the Daily Telegraph(where, I understand, he blogs). In his Telegraph piece he states, “

Why on earth am I standing as an independent candidate in the Corby by-election? The very last thing I want is to be an MP and, in any case, I’d make a ruddy useless politician – as I discovered on my first day of campaigning. Because I’m standing on a single issue ticket as the anti-wind farm candidate, I’m concentrating my efforts on those three bits of East Northamptonshire most threatened by wind developments: Molesworth, Chelveston and Barnwell Manor. So my election agent took me on a recce to meet some of my prospective voters.” This implies he was campaigning and had an election agent. But, Mr John hayes assures us that Mr Delingpole was not a candidate in the by-election.

It occurred to me that despite Mr Delingpole’s utterances in national newspapers and magazines that he was a candidate Mr Hayes may be relying on some legal nicety to suggest that Mr Delingpole was not a candidate. The law, however, tends to support the view that – albeit never nominated – he was a candidate.

For the purposes of election campaigns “candidate” is defined in the Representation of the People Act 1983. The definition section in the 1983 Act is s 118. This defines “candidate” as construed in accordance with s 118A. This provides :

“(2)A person becomes a candidate at a parliamentary election—

(a)on the date of—

(i)the dissolution of Parliament, or

(ii)in the case of a by-election, the occurrence of the vacancy, .

in consequence of which the writ for the election is issued if on or before that date he is declared by himself or by others to be a candidate at the election, and

(b)otherwise, on the day on which he is so declared by himself or by others or on which he is nominated as a candidate at the election (whichever is the earlier).”

The date a person becomes a candidate is the date he or she declares his or her candidature, or the date the vacancy arises in the event that he or she has declared that he or she will be a candidate. Well, Mr Delingpole’s public utterances seem clear. In early September in The Spectator he declared that he would stand. By 17th September in the Telegraph he was talking about a campaign that was up and running. Under the terms of s 118A Mr Delingpole seems to have been a candidate.

Now if you look at the comments from Wightpaint on this Guardian post he seems to imply that unless nominated you can never be a candidate under the 1983 Act. In his biography on The Guardian site he states he used to be an election agent and certainly the way in which people operate in practice is that candidates are those nominated – but the situation in the Delingpole case is unusual. Someone declares he is standing, campaigns, prepares a manifesto, and launches a website but is not formally nominated. In that case can a person be a candidate?

I would argue that he can. One example should show that candidate in Part II of the 1983 Act does not mean a person nominated to be a candidate.

Under the election rules which are found in Schedule 1 to the 1983 Act the process of nomination is considered.  Under these rules, a candidate must consent to his or her nomination under Rule 8. If a candidate does not consent to his nomination then he or she cannot validly be nominated. It wightpaint is correct in his interpretation of “candidate” in Part II of the 1983 Act this would imply that a person that has not consented to nomination could not be a candidate for the purposes of the campaign rules, including the expenses rule. However, s 83 of the 1983 Act provides that certain expenses rules do not apply to a person declared to be a candidate by others, where that person has not consented to the declaration. If wightpaint is correct in his interpretation of “candidate” s 83 would be otiose. But it is there. It is there because the legislature acknowledges that a person may be a “candidate” under Part II of the 1983 Act without being a person nominated under Schedule 1 to the Act.

The conclusion then seems tolerably clear. James Delingpole was a candidate in the Corby by-election. Mr Hayes is wrong in his reply to The Guardian. The full implications of Mr Delingpole being a candidate for Mr Delingpole and for the Conservative party will no doubt be teased out by others.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

X Factor single unveiled: Philip Schofield’s Comin’ to Town

“Philip Schofield’s Comin’ To Town”

They’d better watch out
They’d better not cry
They’d better not pout I’m telling you why
Philip Schofield’s coming to town
He’s making a list,
Checking it twice;
Gonna find out who’s nonces or nice.
Philip Schofield’s coming to town
He sees pervs when he’s sleeping
He sees them when awake
He knows if they’ve been bad or good
So be good for goodness sake
With internet on and google ready
He grills the PM and keeps nerves steady
Philip Schofield’s coming to town
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Philip Schofield’s Mysterious World

Coming soon to ITV1 Philip Schofield’s Mysterious World where Schofield solves the mysteries of the universe using only a tablet, and a wi-fi connection.

Episode 1 – Why the moon landings were faked by Stanley Kubrick

Episode 2 – How shape shifting dimension crossing lizards ruled the world.

Episode 3 – all about that actor offof that show and how he got a superinjunction about that thing that everyone was talking about and his relationship with heroff that other thing.

Episode 4 – the pop star killings of Paul Gambaccini

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Transcript of all news programmes

Good afternoon and here is the Savile. Jimmy Savile. Savile. Savile. new allegations. Well known celebrities. Savile. Household name. Government. Savile. BBC. savile. If you have children you may wish to turn down for a few moments. Savile. So vile. Ring. BBC. Hospitals. Broadmoor. Heart of government. Number 10. Savile. BBC. Savile. Official spokesman. BBC. Radio One. caravan. Savile. Vile.  Savile. BBC. NHS. Hospitals. Prisons. Spare room. Key. Savile. Savile. Allegations. Pulled programmes. Editorial Savile. Vile decisions. So vile Savile. Jimmy Fixed It. Fixed the BBC. Vile. So vile. Stepped aside. Media storm. Went around five newspapers. Savile. None interested. ITV documentary. PAnorama. Newsnight. Savile. Running. Shell suit. Savile. Piers Morgan never met. Savile. So vile. Piers Morgan did meet. Oops. Forgotten. Savile. Newspapers. Photos. Savile. Radio One. Gambaccini. Office next door. never there. We all knew. Everyone knew. Savile. Did nothing. No reports. Not complain. Savile. So vile. What could we do? Savile. Media storm. Story dropped. Heard the stories. We all heard the stories. Everyone knew. Savile. Now then now then. Savile. Fixed. As it happens. Fixed it. Jim Fixed It. CPS. Investigations dropped. Savile. Director General. Savile. Editor of Newsnight. New York Times. Savile. Media circus. Resign. Step aside. All go. Savile. BBC. Savile. Number 10 spokesman.

And in other news we look at the three hundred complaints from people who were frightened, who are still frightened, who weren’t believed, who want to be heard, but let’s not let that take attention away from the main story. How this impacts on the media and the people in the media hawking their stories about the Jimmy they knew and their inexplicable inaction around the studios.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

16 year old prisoners to be given the vote in the independence referendum

Prompted by a tweet from Ian Smart tonight asking if 16 year old prisoners will be given the vote in the independence referendum it seems reasonably clear that the answer must be yes.

First, the Scotland Act 1998 provides that any legislation passed must be compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Section 29 of the Scotland ACt provides that,

“An Act of the Scottish parliament is not law so far as any provision of the Act is outside the legislative competence of the Parliament.”

When is an Act outside competence?

That is determined by s 29 (2) of the Act which says a provision is outside competence if “(d) it is incompatible with any of the Convention rights of with Community law”.

The Convention rights are defined in s 126 of the Scotland Act by reference to the Human Rights Act and includes the European Convention on Human Rights and protocols (including the first protocol which includes the right to vote) and must be assessed in accordance with the jurisprudence of Strasbourg.

The Scottish government has – under the Edinburgh Agreement as commonly understood – the power to determine the franchise for the referendum (which the government wishes to expand from the usual franchise for parliamentary elections to include 16 and 17 year olds). Any legislation to expand the franchise must comply with ECHR jurisprudence regarding the right to vote or the provisions will not be law as being outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament.

When considering the right to vote a line of Strasbourg cases have determined that a blanket ban on prisoners having the vote is contrary to the ECHR. The cases include Hirst v UK, and cases up to Scoppola v Italy (discussed here with lots of links). The Strasbourg jurisprudence has already been applied in Scottish courts in Smith v Scott in 2007  which held that a blanket ban on prisoner voting was contrary to the ECHR and where the Scottish courts, for the first time, issued a declarator of incompatibility indicating that the Representation of the People Act did not comply with the European Convention (this case has been ignored in the discourse in the UK at Westminster on the prisoner voting issue).

Given the decision in Smith v Scott, the support for the decisions relied on in Smith in Scoppola, and s 29 of the Scotland Act any attempt to legislate to extend the franchise without extending the franchise to prisoners will be incompatible with the ECHR and therefore will fall outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament.

The conclusion is straightforward.

If the Scottish government wishes to extend the franchise to 16 and 17 year olds it will have to extend the franchise to prisoners or the referendum legislation may be subject to legal challenge.

I for one would welcome the extension of the franchise to comply with the ECHR requirements some years after the Scottish courts initially pronounced on the issue and against a background of Westminster intransigence. I am sure the Scottish government will not shirk from its ECHR responsibilities.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Donald sodding Trump? I mean which clown thought it sensible to contact Donald sodding Trump?

Today the SNP government confirmed that in order to seek support for the decision to release Megrahi on compassionate grounds it had sought to win support from well known humanitarian and international human rights activist Donald Trump. Mr Trump was sent an email with a draft statement supporting the decision for him to issue.

Occasionally I write satirical things on this blog. The following statement from Alex Salmond’s press spokesman is genuine. I haven’t altered any of it.

“As is well known, the Scottish Government took an important decision to release Abdelbasset Al Megrahi on compassionate grounds, a decision made in good faith.

“We were perfectly entitled to hope for support from international stakeholders. Indeed Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, among many others around the world, supported this decision. We understand Mr Trump did not support this decision which was entirely up to him.”

Hang on. Read that again.

“We were perfectly entitled to hope for support from international stakeholders. Indeed Nelson Mandela, Desmond Tutu, among many others around the world, supported this decision. We understand Mr Trump did not support this decision”

The implication of this is that the approach to Trump was because he was, no, he is an international stakeholder apparently. But a stakeholder in what?

And the implication that the support of Trump is worth mentioning as qualitatively similar to the support of Nobel laureates Mandela and Tutu. Why surely this Trump will be a shoo-in for the Nobel Peace prize later this month. A man of high standing and principle, and vision. Why clearly he is the obvious man to ask to support a quasi-judicial decision in a compassionate release application. If only Donald could be emailed a statement for approval prior to each compassionate release. Surely our country would be a wiser one. And a better place.

The spokesman then swiftly moves on to a string of other things

“Whether it is attacking the RSPB or claiming the Ministry of the Defence answers to the Scottish Government, the comments from the Trump Organisation are becoming increasingly bizarre. No amount of foot stamping will change the fact that the application for the European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre will be considered on its merits and a decision made by Scottish Ministers following full and thorough consideration of all issues relevant to the application.”

Well, so what? That’s important – but from the government that screwed up the planning system by calling in an application when the applicant had a power to appeal (for the first time ever – a ministerial decision that remains unprecedented) – this is just distraction. The magician’s sleight of hand.

But when you ignore the waving hands the central issue remains.

They wrote to Donald sodding Trump for support on this decision.

Someone from Alex Salmond’s office sent an email to Trump seeking his approval and support for a decision in Scotland’s criminal justice system. Why did no-one in Salmond’s office think that that was a bit odd?

I mean, Donald sodding Trump.

Salmond’s office wrote to Donald sodding Trump for approval and support on a criminal justice matter.

What a fine way to run a country.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Some Norman MacCaig for National Poetry Day

It’s national poetry day (apparently). here’s some Norman MacCaig
 
 
Neighbour
 
His car sits outside the house.
It never goes anywhere. Is it
a pet?
 
When he goes for his morning paper
he makes a perfect right-angle
at the corner.
 
What does he do at home? Sit at attention?
Or does he stay in the lobby
like a hatstand?
 
Does his wife know she married
a diagram? That she goes to bed
with a faded blueprint?
 
When I meet him
he greets me with a smile
he must have bought somewhere.
 
His eyes are two teaspoons
that have been emptied
for the last time.

 

(from The Many Days (ed Roderick Watson) (2010) p 85)
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment